Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300M
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300M Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300M, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and NX300M (APS-C) come with different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-820 iHS was manufactured 11 months earlier than the NX300M which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summation of how the TG-820 iHS grades versus the NX300M in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Samsung NX300M. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung NX300M
TG-820 iHS | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | 768k | Crisper screen (+262k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
NX300M | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | February 2012 | More modern by 11 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung NX300M
TG-820 iHS | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with external dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300M has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300M in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the NX300M.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and NX300M is 92 and 86 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The image here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and NX300M.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung NX300M will give you greater detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung NX300M | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung NX300M |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2013-01-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.3" |
Resolution of display | 1,030k dots | 768k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 331g (0.73 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 330 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $500 | $699 |