Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL30
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternate Name is ES15
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL30 Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung SL30, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the SL30 (10MP) is pretty well matched and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-820 iHS was revealed 3 years later than the SL30 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the TG-820 iHS grades versus the SL30 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Samsung SL30. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung SL30
| TG-820 iHS | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 37 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SL30 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung SL30
| TG-820 iHS | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got outer measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL30 has specifications of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung SL30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the SL30.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and SL30 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The photograph below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and SL30.
All in all, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-820 iHS to give you extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher TG-820 iHS is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung SL30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung SL30 |
| Also Known as | - | ES15 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,030k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 140 grams (0.31 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $500 | $93 |