Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB350F
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung WB350F, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe TG-820 iHS was brought out 23 months earlier than the WB350F which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-820 iHS matches up vs the WB350F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung WB350F
| TG-820 iHS | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1030k | 460k | Sharper screen (+570k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| WB350F | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 | February 2012 | More recent by 23 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung WB350F
| TG-820 iHS | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS enjoys outside measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung WB350F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the WB350F.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and WB350F is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and WB350F.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB350F to render greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung WB350F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $500 | $260 |