Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB35F
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Samsung WB35F, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-820 iHS was launched 23 months before the WB35F making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the TG-820 iHS grades against the WB35F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung WB35F
| TG-820 iHS | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| WB35F | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 23 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung WB35F
| TG-820 iHS | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got outer measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the WB35F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and WB35F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing technical specs. The visual underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and WB35F.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB35F to show extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-02-08 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,030 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $500 | $130 |
