Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB700
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released December 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung WB700, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-820 iHS was revealed 14 months after the WB700 making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-820 iHS grades versus the WB700 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung WB700. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung WB700
| TG-820 iHS | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 |  | December 2010 | More modern by 14 months |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 614k | Crisper display (+416k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| WB700 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung WB700
| TG-820 iHS | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features physical measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung WB700 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the WB700.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and WB700 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing specifications. The picture here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and WB700.
To sum up, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung WB700 to show extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images much more aggressively. The younger TG-820 iHS will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung WB700 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-02-08 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,030k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $500 | $300 |
