Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB750
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Portability
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
Samsung WB750
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Introduced September 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Samsung WB750, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-820 iHS was revealed 6 months later than the WB750 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the TG-820 iHS grades against the WB750 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung WB750. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung WB750
| TG-820 iHS | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+570k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| WB750 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung WB750
| TG-820 iHS | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | September 2011 | Similar generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS enjoys external measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB750 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Samsung WB750 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the WB750.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and WB750 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The photograph here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and WB750.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB750 to offer extra detail because of its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Portrait photography with Samsung WB750
has face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (13MP)
provides face detection focusing
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB750 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (193 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography factors
Samsung WB750 Sports photography factors
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
environment proof
low frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (220 shots)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
amazing zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Travel photography with Samsung WB750
environment proof
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse function
not so great battery pack (220 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.9)
lighter than competition (193g)
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (432mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB750 Landscape photography factors
fairly wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
no manual exposure
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
not so great battery pack (220 shots)
missing Timelapse function
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Vlogging with Samsung WB750
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not have a selfie friendly display
missing microphone support
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (193 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung WB750 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,030k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $500 | $339 |