Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sigma DP3 Merrill, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-820 iHS was introduced 11 months before the DP3 Merrill which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the TG-820 iHS grades vs the DP3 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sigma DP3 Merrill. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
TG-820 iHS | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | 920k | Clearer screen (+110k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
DP3 Merrill | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | February 2012 | More recent by 11 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sigma DP3 Merrill
TG-820 iHS | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS offers exterior dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sigma DP3 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sigma DP3 Merrill in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the DP3 Merrill.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and DP3 Merrill is 92 and 83 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing technical specs. The visual below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and DP3 Merrill.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-820 iHS having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will show greater detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sigma |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 75mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,030k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | 330 gr (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $500 | $1,353 |