Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A9
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
65 Imaging
73 Features
93 Overall
81
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Push to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 673g - 127 x 96 x 63mm
- Launched April 2017
- Renewed by Sony A9 II
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A9 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony A9, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and A9 (24MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and A9 (Full frame) provide totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-820 iHS was released 6 years prior to the A9 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A9 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the TG-820 iHS grades against the A9 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A9 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sony Alpha A9. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sony A9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony A9
| TG-820 iHS | A9 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| A9 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2017 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 63 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 1440k |  | 1030k | Crisper display (+410k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony A9
| TG-820 iHS | A9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A9 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS offers external dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony A9 has measurements of 127mm x 96mm x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") having a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony A9 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the A9.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and A9 is 92 and 65 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A9 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking specs. The pic here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and A9.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony A9 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A9 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A9 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Alpha A9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Alpha A9 |
| Class | Waterproof | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2017-04-19 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 847.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 50 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 693 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 673 grams (1.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 127 x 96 x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 92 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 3517 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | 650 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | NP-FZ100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
| Storage slots | Single | 2 |
| Launch cost | $500 | $4,498 |