Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1bd/ce1bd4afb5eccaaa76aec2b4878f9b3d2cf0fd48" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front"
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2008
- Updated by Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony A200, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is fairly close but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-820 iHS was launched 3 years later than the A200 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the TG-820 iHS matches up against the A200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony A200
TG-820 iHS | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | ![]() | July 2008 | Fresher by 44 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
A200 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony A200
TG-820 iHS | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features exterior dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony A200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the A200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9ff6/b9ff6ce221b48ed5fcc7f12ab8bd000075545ada" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and A200 is 92 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80a77/80a77d0c57e78f35d3e52475640d7188bc8605c0" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and A200.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-820 iHS featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will result in more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more modern TG-820 iHS will have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be6f/1be6fd80b380d5ec13f79ed2223dbc96a0da1e90" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52011/520115cfa04b6ac1d00b6fce87432e1a2a13a122" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2008-07-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,030k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 572g (1.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $500 | $100 |