Clicky

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A300

Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Launched February 2012
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Announced January 2008
  • Renewed by Sony A330
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A300 Overview

Here is a thorough review of the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony A300, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The TG-820 iHS was introduced 4 years later than the A300 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the TG-820 iHS matches up vs the A300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony A300

 TG-820 iHS A300 
AnnouncedFebruary 2012January 2008Fresher by 49 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1030k230kCrisper screen (+800k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 A300 TG-820 iHS 
Focus manually More precise focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony A300

 TG-820 iHS A300 
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got exterior measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony A300 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony A300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the A300.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A300 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and A300 is 92 and 64 respectively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and A300.

Clearly, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-820 iHS using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will show more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger TG-820 iHS is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography information
Sony A300 Portrait photography information
27
offers face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
59
focusing manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Street photography camera
Sony A300 as a Street photography camera
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
74
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography details
Sony A300 Sports photography details
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proof
slow fps (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (220 CIPA)
lack of phase detect autofocus
54
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Travel photography with Sony A300
59
environment proof
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
bad battery pack (220 per charge)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
45
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography features
Sony A300 Landscape photography features
38
pretty wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not available
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
bad battery pack (220 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
57
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
megapixel count low (10MP)
lack of Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging highlights
Sony A300 Vlogging highlights
33
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone socket
9
no video shooting
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony A300
 Olympus TG-820 iHSSony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus TG-820 iHS Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Class Waterproof Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2012-02-08 2008-01-30
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VI -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.9-5.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 1,030k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 5.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 206 gr (0.45 lbs) 632 gr (1.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 64
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.4
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Battery life 220 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $500 $0