Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cec1/2cec10f20284888a461f10799c9bdd17f4863091" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front"
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Replaced the Sony NEX-3
- Refreshed by Sony NEX-F3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony NEX-C3, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-820 iHS was introduced 6 months after the NEX-C3 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the TG-820 iHS scores against the NEX-C3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony NEX-C3
TG-820 iHS | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+110k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
NEX-C3 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony NEX-C3
TG-820 iHS | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | ![]() | August 2011 | Same age |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got exterior measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has specifications of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony NEX-C3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the NEX-C3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba481/ba481d71d94f3f6c5f6bad322c5b6c55a5782fe0" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and NEX-C3 is 92 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a312/9a312aedc444f851a12bd696ede2bbd76733a848" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and NEX-C3.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Sony NEX-C3 will render more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4bd9/b4bd94f0f18e59535cd0ad8dc5a9ffe080bb89b6" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e28e4/e28e458c95c7020cbc94352935b5797b60ac4873" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-02-08 | 2011-08-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,030k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 400 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $500 | $343 |