Clicky

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony H300

Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
45
Features
37
Overall
41

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony H300 Key Specs

Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Released February 2012
Sony H300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
  • 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
  • Released February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony H300 Overview

Here is a extended assessment of the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony H300, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and H300 (20MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The TG-820 iHS was revealed 24 months earlier than the H300 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the TG-820 iHS matches up versus the H300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony H300

 TG-820 iHS H300 
Screen resolution1030k460kCrisper screen (+570k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 H300 TG-820 iHS 
ReleasedFebruary 2014February 2012Fresher by 24 months

Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony H300

 TG-820 iHS H300 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features external dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony H300 has proportions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).

See the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony H300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the H300.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony H300 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and H300 is 92 and 63 respectively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony H300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and H300.

As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Sony H300 to resolve extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony H300 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony H300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
Sony H300 as a Portrait photography camera
27
offers face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
40
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
supports face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Street photography camera
Sony H300 as a Street photography camera
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
43
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than others (590 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography features
Sony H300 Sports photography features
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
environment proofing
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low battery pack (220 shots)
lack of phase detect autofocus
50
excellent zoom range (25-875mm 35.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
supports tracking autofocus
good battery life (350 shots)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Sony H300 as a Travel photography camera
59
environment proofing
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse function
low battery pack (220 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
56
good battery life (350 CIPA)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
very long zoom (875mm)
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than others (590g)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography info
Sony H300 Landscape photography info
38
really wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low battery pack (220 shots)
does not have Timelapse function
47
pretty wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
good battery life (350 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging advice
Sony H300 Vlogging advice
33
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone support
24
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focus
sluggish max aperture (f3)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone socket
more heavy than others (590 grams)
Photography Glossary

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony H300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony H300
 Olympus TG-820 iHSSony Cyber-shot DSC-H300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus TG-820 iHS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2012-02-08 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VI Bionz(R)
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 5152 x 3864
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-875mm (35.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/3-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,030k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD Clear Photo LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Viewfinder resolution - 201k dots
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 8.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 206 grams (0.45 lbs) 590 grams (1.30 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 shots 350 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $500 $249