Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX200V
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Portability
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Announced May 2012
- Earlier Model is Sony HX100V
- Later Model is Sony HX300
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX200V Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX200V, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and HX200V (18MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-820 iHS was announced 3 months before the HX200V and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TG-820 iHS grades vs the HX200V with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX200V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony HX200V
| TG-820 iHS | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 922k | Sharper display (+108k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| HX200V | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony HX200V
| TG-820 iHS | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | May 2012 | Same generation |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS provides physical measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sony HX200V has proportions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") and a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX200V in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the HX200V.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and HX200V is 92 and 66 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and HX200V.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Sony HX200V to render more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography details
Sony HX200V Portrait photography details
supports face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (18MP)
has face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography factors
Sony HX200V Street photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Optical)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than average (583 grams)
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Sports photography with Sony HX200V
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proofing
slow fps (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low battery life (220 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
long zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (18 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
good battery pack (450 CIPA)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography factors
Sony HX200V Travel photography factors
weather proofing
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
low battery life (220 CIPA)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
good battery pack (450 per charge)
decent megapixels (18MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (27mm)
very long zoom (810mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (583g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Landscape photography with Sony HX200V
reasonably wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
low battery life (220 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse function
you can focus manually
pretty wide (27mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (18MP)
good battery pack (450 per charge)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Vlogging camera
Sony HX200V as a Vlogging camera
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone support
pretty wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than average (583g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2012-05-11 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,030k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 12.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 583 grams (1.29 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | 450 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $500 | $480 |
