Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX90V
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
91 Imaging
43 Features
63 Overall
51
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX90V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 245g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Introduced April 2015
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX90V Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony HX90V, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and HX90V (18MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-820 iHS was brought out 4 years prior to the HX90V and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the TG-820 iHS matches up vs the HX90V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX90V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Sony HX90V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony HX90V
TG-820 iHS | HX90V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1030k | 921k | Clearer display (+109k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX90V over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
HX90V | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2015 | February 2012 | Fresher by 38 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony HX90V
TG-820 iHS | HX90V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX90V Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got outer measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony HX90V has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony HX90V in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the HX90V.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and HX90V is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX90V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to see the difference between sensor sizing just by going over specifications. The visual here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and HX90V.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Sony HX90V to offer you extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX90V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX90V Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2015-04-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,030k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 638k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | 360 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $500 | $440 |