Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX9V
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
91 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX9V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
- Introduced July 2011
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX9V Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony HX9V, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and HX9V (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-820 iHS was revealed 7 months later than the HX9V so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the TG-820 iHS scores versus the HX9V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX9V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sony HX9V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony HX9V
TG-820 iHS | HX9V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | July 2011 | Fresher by 7 months | |
Screen resolution | 1030k | 921k | Crisper screen (+109k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX9V over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
HX9V | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony HX9V
TG-820 iHS | HX9V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX9V Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with outside dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sony HX9V has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony HX9V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the HX9V.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and HX9V is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX9V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The graphic below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and HX9V.
All in all, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Sony HX9V to render greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer TG-820 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX9V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony HX9V Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,030k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $500 | $328 |