Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
![Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-TG-820-iHS/Olympus-TG-820-iHS-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-II/Sony-RX10-II-front.jpg)
58 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Released June 2015
- Replaced the Sony RX10
- Successor is Sony RX10 III
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony RX10 II, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and RX10 II (20MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and RX10 II (1") possess different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The TG-820 iHS was brought out 4 years before the RX10 II which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-820 iHS scores vs the RX10 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sony RX10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony RX10 II
TG-820 iHS | RX10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
RX10 II | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2015 | ![]() | February 2012 | Newer by 40 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 1030k | Clearer screen (+199k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony RX10 II
TG-820 iHS | RX10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has external measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sony RX10 II has proportions of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") along with a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony RX10 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the RX10 II.
![Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-TG-820-iHS-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-II-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and RX10 II is 92 and 58 respectively.
![Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-TG-820-iHS-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-II-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and RX10 II.
Clearly, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-820 iHS because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony RX10 II will produce greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
![Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II sensor size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-TG-820-iHS-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-II-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-TG-820-iHS-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-II-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-02-08 | 2015-06-10 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,030k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 10.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 813g (1.79 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 400 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $500 | $998 |