Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
79 Imaging
70 Features
58 Overall
65
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Launched June 2013
- Later Model is Sony RX1R II
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony RX1R, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and RX1R (Full frame) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-820 iHS was announced 16 months prior to the RX1R which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TG-820 iHS matches up against the RX1R in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony RX1R
TG-820 iHS | RX1R |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
RX1R | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2013 | February 2012 | Fresher by 16 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1229k | 1030k | Clearer screen (+199k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony RX1R
TG-820 iHS | RX1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with external dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sony RX1R has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony RX1R in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the RX1R.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and RX1R is 92 and 79 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and RX1R.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-820 iHS with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Sony RX1R will give you greater detail with its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2013-06-26 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,030 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 482g (1.06 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 91 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2537 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | 270 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $500 | $2,798 |