Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony T900
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony T900 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony T900, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very similar and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-820 iHS was released 3 years after the T900 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the TG-820 iHS matches up against the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony T900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony T900
| TG-820 iHS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 37 months |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 922k | Crisper display (+108k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| T900 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony T900
| TG-820 iHS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has physical measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony T900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the T900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and T900 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specs. The image here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and T900.
All in all, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of images though you should factor the production date of the products into consideration. The fresher TG-820 iHS should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-02-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 143g (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $500 | $300 |