Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX66
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
97 Imaging
42 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX66 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Revealed February 2012
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX66 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX66, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and TX66 (18MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-820 iHS was revealed within a month of the TX66 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX66 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the TG-820 iHS matches up against the TX66 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX66 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sony TX66 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony TX66
TG-820 iHS | TX66 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX66 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
TX66 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen size | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 1030k | Clearer screen (+200k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony TX66
TG-820 iHS | TX66 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | February 2012 | Similar age | |
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX66 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got physical dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony TX66 has sizing of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") and a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX66 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the TX66.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and TX66 is 92 and 97 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX66 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The pic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and TX66.
As you have seen, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Sony TX66 to give you more detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX66 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX66 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2012-02-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.3" |
Screen resolution | 1,030k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 109 grams (0.24 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 250 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $500 | $350 |