Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX9
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Released July 2010
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX9 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony TX9, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the TX9 (12MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-820 iHS was released 20 months after the TX9 making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the TG-820 iHS matches up vs the TX9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony TX9
TG-820 iHS | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | July 2010 | More modern by 20 months | |
Display resolution | 1030k | 922k | Sharper display (+108k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
TX9 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony TX9
TG-820 iHS | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got physical measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony TX9 has dimensions of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony TX9 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the TX9.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and TX9 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The pic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and TX9.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures though you should factor the production date of the products into consideration. The newer TG-820 iHS is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony TX9 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2010-07-08 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,030k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 149g (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $500 | $799 |