Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W320
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W320 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony W320, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the W320 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-820 iHS was released 2 years after the W320 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the TG-820 iHS grades against the W320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony W320
TG-820 iHS | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | January 2010 | Newer by 26 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1030k | 230k | Crisper screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
W320 | TG-820 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony W320
TG-820 iHS | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS provides exterior dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony W320 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony W320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the W320.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and W320 is 92 and 97 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The image underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and W320.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Sony W320 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern TG-820 iHS provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W320 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2012-02-08 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,030k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 117g (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $500 | $269 |