Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W800
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
96 Imaging
45 Features
29 Overall
38
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.2-6.4) lens
- 125g - 97 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W800 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W800, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and W800 (20MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-820 iHS was unveiled 24 months prior to the W800 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the TG-820 iHS matches up versus the W800 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W800 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sony W800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony W800
| TG-820 iHS | W800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W800 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| W800 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 24 months |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony W800
| TG-820 iHS | W800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W800 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS offers exterior measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony W800 has sizing of 97mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W800 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the W800.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and W800 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W800 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The photograph here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and W800.
Plainly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Sony W800 to render extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images far more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W800 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.2-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,030 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVI MPEG4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 97 x 55 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $500 | $90 |