Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony WX350
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Portability
94 Imaging
43 Features
43 Overall
43
94 Imaging
43 Features
43 Overall
43
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony WX350 Key Specs
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Sony WX350
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 164g - 96 x 55 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Superseded the Sony WX300
- Replacement is Sony WX500
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony WX350 Overview
Below is a in depth review of the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony WX350, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and WX350 (18MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-820 iHS was unveiled 24 months prior to the WX350 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the TG-820 iHS scores against the WX350 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony WX350 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Sony WX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony WX350
| TG-820 iHS | WX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+570k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX350 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| WX350 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 24 months |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony WX350
| TG-820 iHS | WX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony WX350 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features outside measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony WX350 has proportions of 96mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony WX350 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the WX350.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and WX350 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony WX350 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and WX350.
Clearly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Sony WX350 to produce extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony WX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
Sony WX350 as a Portrait photography camera
includes face detect focusing
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
features face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Street photography with Sony WX350
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (164g)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography details
Sony WX350 Sports photography details
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
environment proof
max fps very slow (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery (220 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
features tracking focus
good battery (470 shots)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Sony WX350 as a Travel photography camera
environment proof
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
not so great battery (220 CIPA)
low resolution (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
good battery (470 per charge)
lighter than competitors in class (164g)
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography factors
Sony WX350 Landscape photography factors
quite wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual mode
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
not so great battery (220 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse mode
pretty wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
good battery (470 shots)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging details
Sony WX350 Vlogging details
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone support
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (164 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony WX350 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-02-08 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | VCHD: 28M PS(1,920x1,080/60p) / 24M FX(1,920x1,080/60i) / 17M FH(1,920x1,080/60i),MP4: 12M(1,440x1,080/30fps) / 3M VGA(640x480/30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 164g (0.36 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 96 x 55 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | 470 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (Off / 10sec. / 2sec. / portrait1 / portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $500 | $270 |