Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b8e5/3b8e5417abb59f4ff5b0e0e1d2e85b1e2aff1214" alt="Sony SLT-A57 front Sony SLT-A57 front"
64 Imaging
57 Features
85 Overall
68
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony A57, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and A57 (16MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and A57 (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The TG-820 iHS was brought out 7 months before the A57 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A57 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the TG-820 iHS matches up versus the A57 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sony SLT-A57. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sony A57 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony A57
TG-820 iHS | A57 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper screen (+109k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A57 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
A57 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2012 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 7 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony A57
TG-820 iHS | A57 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS enjoys exterior measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sony A57 has proportions of 132mm x 98mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.2") along with a weight of 618 grams (1.36 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony A57 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the A57.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77f76/77f766bbecbb12e6b7c3c494f3423a894ae4d11e" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and A57 is 92 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80b68/80b68ea96b8fe626e532b6d6bf9ad2e4992c9724" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and A57.
All in all, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-820 iHS due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony A57 will give more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3a3e/c3a3e104ab48a567f6a49d82348c6d00b897b4f6" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d8a0/3d8a0d4995a54f47536c754e8fde59aec935d430" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony A57 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony SLT-A57 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony SLT-A57 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2012-02-08 | 2012-09-13 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | Xtra Fine TFT drive with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 618 grams (1.36 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 132 x 98 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 785 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 550 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $500 | $1,000 |