Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-830 iHS was announced 24 months later than the XZ-1 making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TG-830 iHS grades vs the XZ-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus XZ-1
| TG-830 iHS | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | January 2011 | Fresher by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| XZ-1 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Olympus XZ-1
| TG-830 iHS | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has got outer dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-830 iHS against the XZ-1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and XZ-1 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-830 iHS and XZ-1.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-830 iHS using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will provide you with more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher TG-830 iHS will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-830 iHS | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 214g (0.47 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 320 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $567 |