Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-830 iHS was announced 24 months later than the XZ-1 making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TG-830 iHS grades vs the XZ-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus XZ-1
TG-830 iHS | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | January 2011 | Fresher by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
XZ-1 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Olympus XZ-1
TG-830 iHS | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has got outer dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-830 iHS against the XZ-1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and XZ-1 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-830 iHS and XZ-1.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-830 iHS using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will provide you with more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher TG-830 iHS will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Olympus XZ-1 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214g (0.47 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 320 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $0 | $567 |