Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe TG-830 iHS was announced 24 months later than the XZ-1 making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TG-830 iHS grades vs the XZ-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus XZ-1
| TG-830 iHS | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | January 2011 | Fresher by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| XZ-1 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Olympus XZ-1
| TG-830 iHS | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has got outer dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-830 iHS against the XZ-1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and XZ-1 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-830 iHS and XZ-1.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-830 iHS using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will provide you with more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher TG-830 iHS will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-830 iHS | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 214g (0.47 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 320 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $567 |