Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus TG-830 iHS versus Panasonic ZS200, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is very well matched but the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") use different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-830 iHS was announced 6 years before the ZS200 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the TG-830 iHS matches up against the ZS200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Panasonic ZS200
TG-830 iHS | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
ZS200 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | January 2013 | Fresher by 62 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 1240k | 460k | Clearer display (+780k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Panasonic ZS200
TG-830 iHS | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has outside dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has sizing of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-830 iHS versus Panasonic ZS200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-830 iHS against the ZS200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-830 iHS and ZS200 is 91 and 86 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-830 iHS and ZS200.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-830 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Panasonic ZS200 will resolve extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older TG-830 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 pounds) | 340 grams (0.75 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 370 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $800 |