Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47619/47619e6b1ac91a51a7449bd9802860c5373c0a46" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Panasonic FS25, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and FS25 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-830 iHS was brought out 4 years later than the FS25 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the TG-830 iHS matches up against the FS25 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-830 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Panasonic FS25
TG-830 iHS | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 49 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
FS25 | TG-830 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Panasonic FS25
TG-830 iHS | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has got physical dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Panasonic FS25 has proportions of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Panasonic FS25 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-830 iHS against the FS25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a7c1/0a7c1c50575126c9940bfc0f98cbfdf08d1131fa" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and FS25 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c84e/1c84e6ba565d97b2e13eb975f0f8b5b4d2c2db1a" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out technical specs. The visual here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-830 iHS and FS25.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus TG-830 iHS to produce extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent TG-830 iHS should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3eddb/3eddbd1e48826212507a26ea832a5087866be5a5" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2715/e27158f6e14df95833de410cac542bba314730dd" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) | 148 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $0 | $230 |