Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39


53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ1000

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Panasonic FZ2500, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the FZ2500 (20MP) is fairly close but the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") possess different sensor dimensions.

The TG-830 iHS was revealed 4 years prior to the FZ2500 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the TG-830 iHS grades against the FZ2500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-830 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Panasonic FZ2500
TG-830 iHS | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
FZ2500 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 45 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Panasonic FZ2500
TG-830 iHS | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-830 iHS provides outside dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ2500 has specifications of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") having a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Panasonic FZ2500 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the TG-830 iHS versus the FZ2500.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-830 iHS and FZ2500 is 91 and 53 respectively.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-830 iHS and FZ2500.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-830 iHS with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Panasonic FZ2500 will render more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The older TG-830 iHS will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214g (0.47 pounds) | 915g (2.02 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 350 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $0 | $998 |