Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Pentax K200D
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39


61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Introduced September 2008
- Earlier Model is Pentax K100D S

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Pentax K200D Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus TG-830 iHS versus Pentax K200D, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and K200D (10MP) and the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and K200D (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.

The TG-830 iHS was announced 4 years later than the K200D and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TG-830 iHS scores against the K200D with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-830 iHS and Pentax K200D. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery and Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Pentax K200D
TG-830 iHS | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | September 2008 | More recent by 53 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
K200D | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Pentax K200D
TG-830 iHS | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has outer dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Pentax K200D has specifications of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") along with a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-830 iHS versus Pentax K200D in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the TG-830 iHS versus the K200D.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-830 iHS and K200D is 91 and 61 respectively.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The photograph below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-830 iHS and K200D.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-830 iHS using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will provide you with extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher TG-830 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Pentax K200D |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2013-01-08 | 2008-09-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 pounds) | 690 grams (1.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $0 | $600 |