Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX1
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-830 iHS was manufactured 3 years after the CX1 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the TG-830 iHS grades versus the CX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Ricoh CX1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Ricoh CX1
TG-830 iHS | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | February 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
CX1 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh CX1
TG-830 iHS | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-830 iHS provides exterior measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Ricoh CX1 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-830 iHS versus the CX1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-830 iHS and CX1 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at specs. The image underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-830 iHS and CX1.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-830 iHS to give you extra detail due to its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger TG-830 iHS will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh CX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh CX1 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2009-02-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) | 180 grams (0.40 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $299 |