Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39


92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizing.

The TG-830 iHS was released 3 years after the GR Digital III which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief view of how the TG-830 iHS grades versus the GR Digital III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Ricoh GR Digital III. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Ricoh GR Digital III
TG-830 iHS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 43 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
GR Digital III | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III
TG-830 iHS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has got physical dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-830 iHS and the GR Digital III.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-830 iHS and GR Digital III is 91 and 92 respectively.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through a spec sheet. The image underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-830 iHS and GR Digital III.
Clearly, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-830 iHS featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will give you more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The fresher TG-830 iHS should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $0 | $399 |