Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh WG-4, both Waterproof cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-830 iHS was manufactured 13 months prior to the WG-4 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the TG-830 iHS matches up versus the WG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Ricoh WG-4
| TG-830 iHS | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| WG-4 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 13 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh WG-4
| TG-830 iHS | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-830 iHS offers outer dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the TG-830 iHS versus the WG-4.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-830 iHS and WG-4 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by checking out a spec sheet. The pic here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-830 iHS and WG-4.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP so you can expect comparable quality of images however you should always take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged TG-830 iHS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 214 gr (0.47 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 240 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $0 | $330 |
