Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, both Waterproof digital cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is fairly similar and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-830 iHS was introduced 3 years prior to the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the TG-830 iHS matches up versus the WG-5 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
TG-830 iHS | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
WG-5 GPS | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | January 2013 | More recent by 25 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
TG-830 iHS | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-830 iHS provides outer dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-830 iHS compared to the WG-5 GPS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-830 iHS and WG-5 GPS is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading specifications. The graphic below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-830 iHS and WG-5 GPS.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of files but you should always take the launch date of the products into consideration. The older TG-830 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) | 236 grams (0.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 240 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $500 |