Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh WG-6, both Waterproof cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the WG-6 (20MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-830 iHS was released 6 years earlier than the WG-6 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the TG-830 iHS matches up vs the WG-6 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh WG-6. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery and Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Ricoh WG-6
| TG-830 iHS | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| WG-6 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2018 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 62 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh WG-6
| TG-830 iHS | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has exterior measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-6 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh WG-6 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-830 iHS against the WG-6.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-830 iHS and WG-6 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by seeing specifications. The picture below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-830 iHS and WG-6.
Plainly, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-6 to show extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged TG-830 iHS will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | BuiltIn | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) | 246 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 340 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $271 |