Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61cfa/61cfa7078e9ac6225a553418caffb93a2136e3af" alt="Samsung Galaxy NX front Samsung Galaxy NX front"
82 Imaging
62 Features
76 Overall
67
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 495g - 137 x 101 x 26mm
- Launched June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX Overview
Here is a extended overview of the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Samsung Galaxy NX, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the Galaxy NX (20MP) is fairly well matched but the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and Galaxy NX (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-830 iHS was unveiled 5 months earlier than the Galaxy NX so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung Galaxy NX being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TG-830 iHS grades against the Galaxy NX with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Samsung Galaxy NX. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Samsung Galaxy NX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Samsung Galaxy NX
TG-830 iHS | Galaxy NX |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy NX over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
Galaxy NX | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display dimensions | 4.8" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Samsung Galaxy NX
TG-830 iHS | Galaxy NX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | June 2013 | Similar age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-830 iHS provides outer measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy NX has measurements of 137mm x 101mm x 26mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 1.0") and a weight of 495 grams (1.09 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Samsung Galaxy NX in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-830 iHS against the Galaxy NX.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55e0e/55e0e7a3d613aa2e4ec13b1c615a5426c759a1af" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and Galaxy NX is 91 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d050/8d05097e7184c57cdfeec4a627af036a572bd33b" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking specs. The visual here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-830 iHS and Galaxy NX.
All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-830 iHS using its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Samsung Galaxy NX will resolve greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61cb5/61cb5c2923cc7f6a6482533f9a16757e87e1c643" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX sensor size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84318/843180a01081dae41144fbf9ef3d909d90ca6ef0" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy NX Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Samsung Galaxy NX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Samsung Galaxy NX |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2013-01-08 | 2013-06-20 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 4.8 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | HD TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 lb) | 495 grams (1.09 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 137 x 101 x 26mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 440 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $0 | $1,300 |