Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX500
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39


87 Imaging
67 Features
80 Overall
72
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 287g - 120 x 64 x 43mm
- Announced February 2015
- Old Model is Samsung NX300

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX500 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX500, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and NX500 (28MP) and the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and NX500 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.

The TG-830 iHS was manufactured 3 years earlier than the NX500 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX500 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the TG-830 iHS scores vs the NX500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-830 iHS and Samsung NX500. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery and Samsung NX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Samsung NX500
TG-830 iHS | NX500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX500 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
NX500 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 25 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1036k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+576k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Samsung NX500
TG-830 iHS | NX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-830 iHS enjoys exterior dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Samsung NX500 has sizing of 120mm x 64mm x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-830 iHS and the NX500.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and NX500 is 91 and 87 respectively.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The image below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-830 iHS and NX500.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-830 iHS featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX500 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged TG-830 iHS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX500 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Samsung NX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Samsung NX500 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | DRIMe 5 |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 28 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6480 x 4320 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 209 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,036 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Smart flash, auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, fill w/redeye reduction, 1st-curtain, 2nd-curtain, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.265 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 pounds) | 287 grams (0.63 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 120 x 64 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 87 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1379 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 370 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $800 |