Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung TL320
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB1000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung TL320, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-830 iHS was unveiled 3 years after the TL320 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the TG-830 iHS scores vs the TL320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Samsung TL320. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Samsung TL320
| TG-830 iHS | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | February 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| TL320 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Samsung TL320
| TG-830 iHS | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | The same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-830 iHS enjoys external dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung TL320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-830 iHS against the TL320.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-830 iHS and TL320 is 91 and 98 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by seeing specifications. The pic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-830 iHS and TL320.
Plainly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-830 iHS to produce extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern TG-830 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Olympus TG-830 iHS | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Samsung TL320 |
| Also called | - | WB1000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $380 |