Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sigma DP2
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
86 Imaging
43 Features
28 Overall
37
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Announced September 2009
- Refreshed by Sigma DP2s
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sigma DP2, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and DP2 (5MP) and the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and DP2 (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-830 iHS was launched 3 years after the DP2 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the TG-830 iHS matches up versus the DP2 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Sigma DP2. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Sigma DP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Sigma DP2
| TG-830 iHS | DP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | September 2009 | More modern by 41 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| DP2 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sigma DP2
| TG-830 iHS | DP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-830 iHS offers outer measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 has measurements of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sigma DP2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-830 iHS versus the DP2.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and DP2 is 91 and 86 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The image below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-830 iHS and DP2.
To sum up, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-830 iHS due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern TG-830 iHS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Specifications
| Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sigma DP2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sigma DP2 |
| Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2009-09-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 15s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 214 grams (0.47 lb) | 280 grams (0.62 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $649 |