Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony QX100
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
92 Imaging
51 Features
44 Overall
48
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony QX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
- Released September 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony QX100 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-830 iHS versus Sony QX100, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Lens-style by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the QX100 (20MP) is relatively similar but the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and QX100 (1") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-830 iHS was manufactured 8 months prior to the QX100 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony QX100 being a Lens-style camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise summation of how the TG-830 iHS grades versus the QX100 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony QX100 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Sony QX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Sony QX100
| TG-830 iHS | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX100 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| QX100 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2013 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 8 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony QX100
| TG-830 iHS | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony QX100 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has physical measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Sony QX100 has sizing of 63mm x 63mm x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-830 iHS versus Sony QX100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-830 iHS vs the QX100.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and QX100 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony QX100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The visual underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-830 iHS and QX100.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-830 iHS featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony QX100 will offer more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older TG-830 iHS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony QX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony QX100 Specifications
| Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 |
| Class | Waterproof | Lens-style |
| Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2013-09-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | - |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 214g (0.47 lb) | 179g (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 200 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $268 |