Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Announced September 2017
- Succeeded the Sony RX10 III
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus TG-830 iHS versus Sony RX10 IV, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the RX10 IV (20MP) is pretty comparable but the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and RX10 IV (1") posses different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-830 iHS was unveiled 5 years earlier than the RX10 IV which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the TG-830 iHS grades vs the RX10 IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Sony RX10 IV
TG-830 iHS | RX10 IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
RX10 IV | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2017 | January 2013 | More modern by 56 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1440k | 460k | Clearer screen (+980k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony RX10 IV
TG-830 iHS | RX10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has got outer dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Sony RX10 IV has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-830 iHS versus Sony RX10 IV in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-830 iHS and the RX10 IV.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-830 iHS and RX10 IV is 91 and 52 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by going through specs. The picture below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-830 iHS and RX10 IV.
All in all, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-830 iHS with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony RX10 IV will provide extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged TG-830 iHS will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2017-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 214 gr (0.47 lbs) | 1095 gr (2.41 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 400 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $1,698 |