Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX1R II
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
78 Imaging
76 Features
65 Overall
71
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Launched October 2015
- Superseded the Sony RX1R
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX1R II Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX1R II, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and RX1R II (Full frame) offer different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-830 iHS was released 3 years prior to the RX1R II which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the TG-830 iHS grades vs the RX1R II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX1R II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Sony RX1R II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Sony RX1R II
TG-830 iHS | RX1R II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
RX1R II | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2015 | January 2013 | Newer by 33 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 460k | Sharper display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony RX1R II
TG-830 iHS | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-830 iHS provides physical dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Sony RX1R II has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX1R II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the TG-830 iHS versus the RX1R II.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-830 iHS and RX1R II is 91 and 78 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching specs. The picture here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-830 iHS and RX1R II.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-830 iHS because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony RX1R II will render extra detail as a result of its extra 26MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged TG-830 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2015-10-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7952 x 5304 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 14cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 pounds) | 507 grams (1.12 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 97 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3204 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $0 | $3,300 |