Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony T900
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony T900 Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony T900, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-830 iHS was revealed 3 years later than the T900 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the TG-830 iHS matches up versus the T900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Sony T900
| TG-830 iHS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 48 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| T900 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony T900
| TG-830 iHS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has external measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony T900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the TG-830 iHS vs the T900.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and T900 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-830 iHS and T900.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-830 iHS to offer you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer TG-830 iHS provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 214 gr (0.47 pounds) | 143 gr (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $300 |