Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX200V
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX200V Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony TX200V, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-830 iHS was unveiled 12 months after the TX200V and they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TG-830 iHS grades versus the TX200V with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Sony TX200V
| TG-830 iHS | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| TX200V | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.3" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony TX200V
| TG-830 iHS | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-830 iHS offers exterior dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has sizing of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-830 iHS vs the TX200V.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and TX200V is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The picture underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-830 iHS and TX200V.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Sony TX200V to show more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher TG-830 iHS should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 214g (0.47 lbs) | 129g (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $0 | $500 |