Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33cd2/33cd28345d5c20140d1ffa809c55d121dceebee0" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 front"
97 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the W350 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The TG-830 iHS was released 3 years after the W350 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony W350 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TG-830 iHS grades versus the W350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Sony W350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Sony W350
TG-830 iHS | W350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 37 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
W350 | TG-830 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony W350
TG-830 iHS | W350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-830 iHS offers physical measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Sony W350 has proportions of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-830 iHS vs the W350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85719/85719ae8098717b1a637e9fee7f5532c2f679ccd" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-830 iHS and W350 is 91 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de8e5/de8e50a4fe20ed0cb84e7101c7c8821307874dab" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by going through technical specs. The image here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-830 iHS and W350.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-830 iHS to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher TG-830 iHS will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fe3e/3fe3e8d9637f49ece5b5dbb29c9ede028307c841" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b36e0/b36e076344c2bc3306849782ae8165c509cded92" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W350 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 pounds) | 117 grams (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $0 | $200 |