Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-330
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VR-330, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very close and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-1 iHS was launched 16 months later than the VR-330 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the TG-1 iHS grades against the VR-330 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus VR-330
| TG-1 iHS | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | February 2011 | More recent by 16 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| VR-330 | TG-1 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VR-330
| TG-1 iHS | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-1 iHS has got external dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VR-330 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the VR-330.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-1 iHS and VR-330 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The graphic below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and VR-330.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus VR-330 to result in more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics much more aggressively. The newer TG-1 iHS provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Olympus VR-330 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-05-08 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 610k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $399 | $220 |
