Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FS12
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Panasonic FS12, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the FS12 (12MP) is very close and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-1 iHS was manufactured 3 years after the FS12 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TG-1 iHS grades versus the FS12 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Panasonic FS12
| TG-1 iHS | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 38 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| FS12 | TG-1 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Panasonic FS12
| TG-1 iHS | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-1 iHS enjoys exterior dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Panasonic FS12 has proportions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Panasonic FS12 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-1 iHS versus the FS12.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and FS12 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching technical specs. The image underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-1 iHS and FS12.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical MP and you can expect comparable quality of files however you have to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The fresher TG-1 iHS is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-05-08 | 2009-04-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.30 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 129 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $399 | $228 |
