Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Announced September 2016
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") use different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-1 iHS was unveiled 5 years before the FZ2500 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the TG-1 iHS grades versus the FZ2500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Panasonic FZ2500
TG-1 iHS | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
FZ2500 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | May 2012 | Newer by 53 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 610k | Crisper display (+430k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Panasonic FZ2500
TG-1 iHS | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-1 iHS enjoys outside dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ2500 has proportions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") having a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the FZ2500.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and FZ2500 is 91 and 53 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The pic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and FZ2500.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-1 iHS using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Panasonic FZ2500 will offer you extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged TG-1 iHS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-05-08 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 915g (2.02 pounds) |
Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 350 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI90B | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $399 | $998 |