Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic G95
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Revealed April 2019
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-G90
- Old Model is Panasonic G85
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic G95, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and G95 (20.3MP) and the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and G95 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-1 iHS was manufactured 8 years before the G95 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the TG-1 iHS scores against the G95 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Panasonic G95
TG-1 iHS | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
G95 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2019 | May 2012 | More modern by 84 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 610k | Crisper screen (+630k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Panasonic G95
TG-1 iHS | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-1 iHS comes with physical measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Panasonic G95 has specifications of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic G95 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the G95.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-1 iHS and G95 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-1 iHS and G95.
To sum up, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-1 iHS due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Panasonic G95 will offer you greater detail due to its extra 8.3MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-1 iHS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-05-08 | 2019-04-05 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20.3 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 610k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 536 gr (1.18 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 290 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $399 | $998 |