Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic ZR3
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-ZX3
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Panasonic ZR3, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the ZR3 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-1 iHS was revealed 2 years later than the ZR3 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TG-1 iHS scores against the ZR3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic ZR3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Panasonic ZR3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Panasonic ZR3
| TG-1 iHS | ZR3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 28 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| ZR3 | TG-1 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Panasonic ZR3
| TG-1 iHS | ZR3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-1 iHS has outer dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR3 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Panasonic ZR3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the ZR3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and ZR3 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out specifications. The visual below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-1 iHS and ZR3.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Panasonic ZR3 to show greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern TG-1 iHS will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 |
| Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-ZX3 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-05-08 | 2010-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.30 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 159 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $399 | $280 |
