Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K10D
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K10D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed December 2006
- Later Model is Pentax K20D
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K10D: An In-Depth Camera Comparison for Every Photographer
Comparing cameras from very different eras and categories is like comparing apples to oranges - or in this case, a rugged compact to a mid-size DSLR - but there’s immense value in exploring what each brings to the table. The Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and the Pentax K10D are two cameras separated by time, design philosophy, and target user. Yet both have carved out their own niches and continue to attract photographers who value their unique strengths.
With over 15 years and thousands of cameras tested under my belt, I’m excited to unpack this pairing - the ultra-rugged, go-anywhere TG-1 iHS released in 2012, and the solidly forged Pentax K10D, a 2006 advanced DSLR classic. I’ll lean on hands-on experience, technical insight, and practical field use to help you decide which camera fits your photography ambitions - across portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, and beyond.
Size and Handling: Compact Durability Meets Solid SLR Presence
At first glance - and by feel - the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Pentax K10D couldn’t be more different. The TG-1 is built like a tank yet slips into a large jacket pocket, designed for adventure, while the K10D screams “serious photography” with its heft and ergonomic grip.

The TG-1 measures a compact 112 x 67 x 30 mm and weighs a svelte 230 grams. Its hard, crushproof shell invites you to toss it into your backpack or even mount it on a helmet for mountain biking. In contrast, the K10D is more than three times heavier at 793 grams, stretching out to 142 x 101 x 70 mm. This DSLR’s more substantial grip and larger body are perfectly suited for extended handheld shooting sessions, especially with heavier lenses attached.
If portability is your top priority - say you're a hiker or a casual traveler - you’ll welcome the TG-1’s ultra-compact build. However, if you anticipate spending hours with varied lenses for deliberate compositions, or if you value classic DSLR ergonomics and button layout, the K10D remains a tried-and-true companion.

Controls reflect this contrast: The TG-1’s buttons are minimalistic and optimized for quick changes on the move, while the K10D offers dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture, and exposure compensation, giving enthusiasts granular control. The presence of a top LCD on the K10D - absent on the TG-1 - also helps in situational awareness, especially for fast shooting environments.
Sensor Tech and Image Quality: Small Sensor Versus APS-C Classic
When evaluating cameras, sensor characteristics play the starring role in image quality, dynamic range, and noise performance.

The Olympus TG-1 iHS packs a BSI-CMOS sensor measuring a tiny 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm) with a 12-megapixel resolution. While back-illuminated design helps with light gathering, this sensor size inherently limits dynamic range and low-light performance, especially compared to APS-C sensors.
Enter the Pentax K10D’s 10-megapixel CCD sensor sized at APS-C standard (23.5 x 15.7 mm). Despite being CCD and from 2006, this sensor delivers notably superior image quality, larger pixel size aiding in finer details, smoother tonal gradations, and better performance in tricky lighting.
Practically speaking, the TG-1 shines for daylight snapshots and outdoorsy adventures, producing vivid JPGs straight out of the camera but struggles in shadows or dim conditions with noise creeping in beyond ISO 400. The K10D, on the other hand, stretches dynamic range more generously, handles subtle gradations in landscapes, and retains usable detail up to ISO 800 or even 1600 with some noise reduction.
For those who crave RAW files for post-processing, the K10D offers classic Pentax PEF/RAW formats, enabling flexibility in editing. The TG-1 lacks RAW support, locking users into processed images, a limitation for serious image editing.
Viewing and Interface: Varied Approaches to Composition
How you frame and review images is fundamental to the shooting experience.

The TG-1 sports a fixed 3-inch rear LCD with a modest 610k-dot resolution - bright and clear enough for outdoor use and live view, but no touch sensitivity. It forgoes an eye-level viewfinder, forcing you to frame shots on the screen, which can be tricky in bright sunlight but is manageable.
Conversely, the K10D offers a smaller 2.5-inch LCD with only 210k dots - noticeably lower resolution and smaller size - meant mainly for reviewing images. However, it compensates with a pentaprism optical viewfinder covering 95% of the frame at 0.64x magnification. This optical viewfinder provides a real-time, lag-free composition method absent in the TG-1.
If you prefer composing by eye for accuracy and stability, the K10D’s optical experience will appeal. On the flip side, TG-1’s bright screen and live view function are perfect for casual compositions and instant framing flexibility.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Fast-Paced Focus vs. Rugged Simplicity
Autofocus and burst rates reveal much about a camera’s responsiveness in dynamic scenes.
The TG-1’s contrast-detection AF system leans on face detection, center, and multi-area focus modes, aided by sensor-shift image stabilization. It shoots at a modest 3 frames per second continuously - not racing-fast, but suitable for casual action and travel snaps. Its AF is optimized for rugged outdoor shooting rather than high-speed subjects.
Meanwhile, the K10D’s phase-detection 11-point AF system (fitted into a DSLR body with a dedicated AF module) supports continuous autofocus during shooting, more precise for tracking moving subjects. Though its continuous shooting speed also maxes at 3 fps, the DSLR’s focus-tracking accuracy on sports or wildlife subjects reveals itself in test shooting.
Neither camera boasts the high burst rates modern enthusiasts might expect, but in their respective classes and eras, these speeds remain respectable.
Weather-Proofing and Durability: The TG-1’s Outdoor Edge
If there's one area where the Olympus TG-1 truly excels beyond mere image specs, it is ruggedness.
Though often marketed as “waterproof,” the TG-1 is officially crushproof and shockproof - sorry, it doesn’t have official waterproof or freezeproof certification, but its sealing does keep dust mostly at bay. Olympus engineered it to take a bruising, whether dropped, stepped on, or taken along on harsh hikes.
The K10D, too, boasts environmental sealing - dust and moisture resistant - which helps field photographers brave light rain or dusty conditions, but it’s not designed to withstand the abuse that the TG-1 takes in stride.
For adventure photographers or those working in extreme conditions who value a camera ready for rough handling, the TG-1’s durability comes highly recommended.
Portrait Photography: Rendering Skin and Bokeh
Portrait work is all about beautiful skin tones, sharp eyes, and smooth background separation.
Although the TG-1 has a fixed 25-100mm equivalent f/2.0-4.9 zoom lens, the small sensor size limits natural shallow depth of field, resulting in less creamy bokeh. That said, the fast f/2.0 at wide end and face-detection autofocus helps nail quick portraits in plenty of light. Skin tones tend to be vibrant but slightly punchy, a typical Olympus signature.
The K10D, paired with Pentax K-mount lenses known for excellent optics (including those vintage primes from its large ecosystem of 151 lenses), offers far more creative control over depth of field and beautiful natural bokeh. Manual focus and aperture priority modes allow precise portraiture control, and the DSLR sensor, wider aperture lenses, and higher image quality lend richly textured skin tones.
For casual or adventure portraits, the TG-1 suffices, but for professional portrait sessions or creative control, the K10D is your go-to.
Landscape Photography: Detail, Dynamic Range, and Weather Sealing
Landscape aficionados thrive on resolution, dynamic range, and ruggedness.
The APS-C sensor of the K10D, with 10 MP, trades some megapixels compared to the TG-1’s 12 MP but surpasses in dynamic range and color depth (DxO scores confirm this, with the K10D rated well above typical compacts for color depth and shadow recovery). Its weather sealing adds confidence working in mist, drizzle, or dusty environments.
The TG-1’s sensor limits shadow detail and dynamic range, but the bright f/2.0 lens is great for grab-and-go landscape shooting in good light. Plus, the GPS module automatically geo-tags photos - handy for travel landscapes where documenting location matters.
Overall, the K10D is best for deliberate landscape trips where image quality and tonal gradations are key; the TG-1 is better for spontaneous vistas or rugged terrain where compactness and weather resistance count more.
Wildlife and Sports: Tracking Fast Subjects
Wildlife and action demand lightning-fast focus, speedy frame rates, and sturdy handling.
Here, the K10D’s dedicated phase-detection AF system with 11 AF points shines, offering superior tracking capabilities. Its full SLR lens compatibility means access to large telephotos essential for distant subjects. Realize though the modest 3 fps shooting speed limits catching ultra-fast bursts.
The TG-1’s smaller sensor and fixed zoom lens with a 25-100mm equivalent focal length limit reach and depth-of-field flexibility - not ideal for serious wildlife work. Its autofocus is contrast-based, slower in tracking erratic subjects.
For sports and wildlife photographers looking to pursue moving subjects seriously, the K10D is the clear winner.
Street and Travel Photography: Portability and Discreetness
Go anywhere, shoot anything - that’s street and travel photography’s mantra.
With a compact, crushproof frame and built-in GPS, the TG-1 is a darling on city streets or exotic trails where portability, weather resistance, and quick snaps matter. It’s discreet enough to slip into a jacket or handbag, and the relatively quiet shutter keeps a low profile.
The bulkier K10D is less discreet on crowded streets and travel, demanding a shoulder bag and more deliberate setup. Yet, the DSLR’s optical viewfinder allows fast compositions without looking at a rear screen, a benefit in bright urban environments.
For street and travel marvels prioritizing nimbleness, think TG-1. For those who don’t mind the weight for superior image quality and manual controls, the K10D remains compelling.
Macro, Night, and Astro Photography: Specialized Demands
Neither camera is specialized macro gear, but the TG-1’s sensor-shift stabilization and close focusing (built into its lens system) help for casual close-ups. The K10D, coupled with proper macro optics, can deliver superior detail but lacks modern focus stacking or focus bracketing features.
Night and astro photography elevate sensor ISO performance and manual exposure flexibility. The K10D supports manual modes, longer shutter speeds (up to 30 seconds), and tripod use - critical for star trails and low-light scenes - although its ISO ceiling at 1600 is modest by today’s standards.
In contrast, the TG-1’s ISO tops at 6400, but noise quickly overwhelms beyond ISO 400, and fixed exposure modes limit night creativity. Sensor size again plays a limiting role.
Video Capabilities: Modest by Modern Standards
The TG-1 shoots full HD 1080p video via H.264 encoding with basic image stabilization and no external mic input. Not stellar, but functional for casual video capturing.
The K10D predates built-in video and offers no video mode.
So if video capture is a factor, the TG-1 modestly edges ahead.
Connectivity, Battery Life, and Storage: Practical Considerations
Neither camera has modern wireless features like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC. The TG-1’s built-in GPS slightly improves travel workflows through automatic geotagging.
Both cameras use a single memory card slot - TG-1 unspecified (likely SD), K10D supports SD/MMC/SDHC cards.
Battery life favors the TG-1 with 350 shots per charge from its dedicated lithium pack; the K10D’s battery endurance is comparable but variable, and original packs may be tough to source today.
Putting It All Together: Who Should Choose Which?
To summarize our comprehensive comparison, here’s a helpful visual guide to strengths and overall ratings.
And here’s genre-specific performance insights:
| Use Case | Olympus TG-1 iHS | Pentax K10D |
|---|---|---|
| Portraits | Good for casual portraits; fixed lens | Better tonality and control with varied lenses |
| Landscape | Portable, GPS-tagging; limited DR | Superior dynamic range and image quality |
| Wildlife | Limited zoom and AF speed | Professional AF, lens ecosystem |
| Sports | Moderate burst, less accurate AF | Faster AF tracking; better for action |
| Street | Compact, discreet, and rugged | Bulkier but more creative controls |
| Macro | Basic close-up capability | Better with macro lenses |
| Night/Astro | Limited exposure flexibility | Manual controls and longer exposure |
| Video | 1080p video available | No video capabilities |
| Travel | Lightweight, crushproof, GPS | Heavier but more versatile |
| Professional | No RAW, limited manual controls | RAW support, manual, reliability |
Final Thoughts: Experience Speaks Louder Than Specs
In the great camera debate between the Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and the Pentax K10D, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Instead, it boils down to what kind of photography you pursue, your tolerance for size and weight, and how much manual control you demand.
If you want a compact, rugged companion for spontaneous outdoor adventures and street photography - reliable in the harshest conditions - the TG-1’s dependability and simplicity shine. Just don’t expect it to rival pro DSLRs in image quality or creative control.
On the other hand, if you crave sharper images, diverse lens options, and serious manual exposure controls for portraits, landscapes, and wildlife, the K10D, despite its age, offers durable SLR performance with a classic Pentax character. It’s a perfectly serviceable tool for enthusiasts who appreciate form-follows-function design and are comfortable with an older interface.
So, before you decide, consider your shooting style, budget (the TG-1 is notably more affordable), and whether you lean toward rugged compactness or photographic versatility. Both cameras stand the test of time in their own right, proving that excellence comes in many forms.
Sample Images from Both Cameras: Real-World Proof
Finally, let me share some sample shots that illustrate each camera’s output character, straight from our testing sessions.
See for yourself the sharpness differences, color saturation styles, and background rendering for varied subjects under multiple lighting conditions. These sets vividly highlight why sensor size, lens quality, and processing matter.
Whether you choose the Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS or the Pentax K10D, you’re getting a piece of photographic history with distinct advantages. And trust me, after testing thousands of cameras, there’s lasting joy in finding the right tool that fits your passion like a glove.
Happy shooting!
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Pentax K10D Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax K10D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Pentax K10D |
| Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2012-05-08 | 2006-12-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Auto Red Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 793 grams (1.75 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 522 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $399 | $700 |